Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Tales of Adaptation

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world, but the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

So spake George Bernard Shaw.  Biologically  we are   hard  wired to  adapt, but mentally we are determined  to resist and conquer   Adaptation   is not an accident, but an  intentional evolutionary trick, in other words a  time tested  route to survival.  Recent  research papers highlight this unique trait  the  quintessential characteristic of evolution,  instances when adaptation becomes  the best form of resistance. Here are a few such tales. 

We don't consider cockroaches intelligent, even when told that in the event of a nuclear war, they will be the sole survivors. We  lay all kinds of traps for them, to wipe them from the surface of the earth.  However, the tiny cockroach is smart enough to see through all such  tricks and in turn develops its own defense strategy. Sugar   is the key  additive in  the bait recipes to lure cockroaches  and  would you believe it, German cockroaches (blattella germanica) have evolved a clever way of saying "NO" to these sweet poisons.   Wada-Katsumata and his team carried out a  comparative study of two populations of cockroaches over several years.   The test group,  was consistently and continuously exposed to  glucose containing insecticide and the control group   was reared free of  restrictions. The lifespan of these insects could be as long as  9 months. After several years,  using glucose and caffeine for sweet and bitter taste the team monitored the responses of both populations of   cockroaches. That is, they monitored the responses of four specific GRNs, ( Gustatory Receptor Neurons, or simply the  taste buds) of cockroaches. GRNs are the quality control lab for edibility and taste.   In normal unbiased cockroaches  GRN1 responds exclusively  to sweet taste, and GRN2   exclusively to bitter , while GRN3 and 4 could be titillated by both sweet  and bitter taste.  Analyzing the  resultant neuronal signals generated at these GRNs,   the  investigators  found that years of continued exposure to  sweet poison,  triggered glucose aversion in the test  population. Their  GRNs had undergone modifications with the result that sugar   tasted  bitter and they consciously avoided the baits.   And this   information was built into their genetic make-up and passed on to  successive generations. 

Just as,  thousands of years ago,  natural selection favored a deliberate mutation in the hemoglobin gene of the sub Saharan Africans faced with a deadly form of malaria. This mutation  turned the nice spongy disc like hemoglobin into a sickly looking sickle shape  but bestowed resistance to the disease and thus  ensured survival. It is  suggested  that  sickle cell hemoglobin molecules don't confront the  malaria parasites at all, they simply raise the tolerance factor of  human blood to these parasites (2). This heritable trait is passed onto the offspring.  However there is a catch. We carry  two copies of every gene.  A combination of normal plus  mutated gene works as a protective armor, but if  both are mutated  then  other lethal complications set in.

So what is the dynamics of adaptation?  A rather elaborate study on evolving yeast populations has yielded at least  some of the answers.  Lang et al who pioneered this study found that when faced with challenges, the organisms split into groups and  try several pathways all at once  and the best one survives. (3). 

Rats, in a similar fashion can rewire their metabolic capabilities when the need arises. Stylopoulos and his team  were studying rats which underwent GBP. GBP in more explicit terms is gastric bypass procedures. GBP, (and there are several types)  is a medical procedure to down size stomach.  It is  being recommended  as a treatment for weight reduction for  obesity and possibly obesity related diabetes.    Surgically,   top portion  of the stomach    is sliced off and then  directly connected to   the small intestine (jejunum), thus bypassing almost 90% of the stomach pouch. Smaller the stomach, lesser the food intake, that is the logic.  But then stomach is not just a passive receptacle for food, it  plays a crucial  functional  role in human machinery. So what happens when the major portion of stomach is eliminated and   undigested food is  tipped into the small intestine ? Stylopoulos and his team  observed that the gut almost immediately  adapts to improve glucose homeostasis, by slightly enlarging itself and enhancing glucose expenditure. 


But alas the benefits of the GBP stops  with the individual, their offspring  still retain the risk of obesity and diabetes(4).  Being inclusive of next generations, doesn't make business sense either, does it? 



1. Changes in taste neurons support the emergence of an adaptive behaviour in 
    cockroaches. Wada-Katsumata etal Science p. 972- 975 24 May 2013,
2.Sickle Haemoglobin confers tolerance to Palsmodium infection.Marguti et al.Cell           
   145(3)398-409    
3. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations 
    Lang et al Nature 29 August, 2013, pages 571-574
4. Reprogramming of intestinal glucose metabolisk and glycemic control in rats after   
    gastric bypass. Seidi et al Science page 406-410, 26 July 2013
5. Heavy toll of stomach surgery :Nature 29 August 2013 page 504


Stockholm archipelago: view from the ship