According to Bible, the very first murder was committed by the very first naturally born human . The first born of Adam and Eve, Cain, contrives to murder Abel, his own brother, in a fit
of jealousy. Ever since that first murder, violence has became a
part of human life. Violence must have been the quintessential quality of
the primitive man, when he had to coexist with the wild
animals in accordance with jungle laws. Living in unfriendly terrains meant his
very existence depended on his muscle power. From the hunter
gatherer, as he, ever so slowly, metamorphosed into a farmer, he acquired or rather developed
certain extraordinary skills. First of all he learned the economics of survival , the trade off between productive foraging versus self annihilation. Alienating himself from the jungle, he tamed and domesticated wild animals and
plants for his own selfish needs. As a part of community living he also learned to communicate more
effectively with his kith and kin. The clicks and clocks of the tongue
gave way to well structured languages One would naturally conclude
that language would have at least to some extent, mitigated
mindless violence by facilitating arguments
debates, discussions, negotiations and compromises.
In fact Sigmund
Freud would have us believe that man had to willingly suppress his
animal instincts, especially the
aggressive trait, in order to set up a civilized society(1). Incidentally I have been (re)reading the La Bete
Humaine ( The Human Beast) written in 1889 by Emile Zola
(2). The story is set against the backdrop of industrial revolution
and introduction fo railways in France .
The protagonist in the novel, Jacques, an engine driver, is
besieged with a violent urge to kill, whenever he tries to get intimate with a
female. He himself is exasperated and deeply traumatized by this
strange trait within. He tries to reason with himself, but to no avail.
At one point he concludes that this is a trait inherited from the primitive man
and can’t be just wished away.
That is when the
issue of Science dated 18th May 2012 (3) arrived with a special
section on violence. Violence is analyzed and interpreted from various
angles. There is no conclusive evidence that civilized man is less prone
to violence than the primitive man. There are enough arguments for and against. This particular issue of
Science is worth reading not just once, but many times over.
In a very concise yet incisive editorial, Professor
David Hamburg emphasizes the need to contain violence, as we contain a
contagious disease. Look for early symptoms and prevent the spread
then and there. There is no single, simple answer to how violence erupts. But with a better sense of the after effects of mindless violence, we should be able to " manage " it ; this is the least we can do as human race .
Scholarly essays spread over 80 pages deal very seriously
with the genesis and developmental sociology of human conflicts and violence. But then came relief
in the form of examples from animal kingdom.(4) Though we inherited the trait from them, they don’t always resort to a "fight to
kill policy" to resolve conflict. There are many other ways of shooing
and scaring the enemy away, so
why fight to kill and be killed or injure and be injured? Take the case of Australian ants, Iridomyrmex purpureus, They have a battalion of
able bodied members forming the Border
Security Force, forever safeguarding
their territorial boundaries. The honeypot
ants occasionally hold power displays
or friendly matches just to profess their strength, " Stay away, See what we are capable of". And then the practice
among the green wood hoopoe, a bird native to South Africa . Living in groups, they defend their territories and scare away intruders and enemies by simply
calling as loudly as possible.
1. Das
Unbehagen in der Kultur ( Civilization and its Discontents) S. Freud
2. La Bete
Humaine ( The Human Beast) Emile Zola